Who is the author of The Interior Castle and The Way of Perfection?

"A Tale of Contingency Planning"

In the hushed corridors of a Spanish-era colegio, where the scent of varnished wood and old ink hung heavy in the air, a lone figure sat beneath the amber glow of a flickering oil lamp. The young José Rizal bent over a sturdy mahogany desk, quill in hand, its feathered tip gliding over parchment as though each stroke carried the weight of centuries.

Around him, towering shelves groaned under the burden of ancient tomes, their cracked leather spines whispering tales of forgotten empires. Outside, the night was silent save for the occasional cry of a distant carriage wheel clattering over cobblestone streets. Yet here, in this sanctuary of candlelight and ink, a revolution of thought was quietly being born.

Rizal gathered data as a jeweler gathers rare gems—patiently, meticulously, with reverence. He spoke to elders in the plazas, pored over colonial records guarded by friars, and noted every story whispered by fishermen, farmers, and merchants. His quill moved not with haste but with precision, as though he knew that each detail was a brick in the foundation of a nation’s future.

And then there was another.
A nameless classmate.
A shadow of the academy who seldom appeared at lectures, who mocked the smell of old books and scoffed at the dim glow of study lamps. This man, with arrogance as his only compass, dared to write his own account of their generation’s story. His “history” was hurried, loud, and empty—a hollow proclamation with no roots in truth. His quill, though swift, carved only illusions on cheap paper that would crumble with time.

Whose book, then, would history remember?

The Architecture of a True Plan

A contingency plan is like the grand stone cathedrals of the era—it cannot be built overnight. It demands calculation, patience, and devotion.
Data, like finely cut adobe and marble, must be gathered piece by piece. Maps of risk are drawn with the care of cartographers; every potential threat catalogued as carefully as a friar’s script.

But a plan made without data is like a house of nipa huts before a storm—fragile, fleeting, and doomed.

The Weight of the Author’s Hand

In an age where words could stir nations, the name of an author carried power akin to a crest upon a royal seal. A plan, like a book, inherits the soul of its maker.

Would you entrust the fate of your people, your livelihood, or your family to the work of a man who never studied the tides of history nor walked the roads he claimed to map?

Rizal’s writings endure not because they were written, but because they were earned. His quill bore witness to a thousand truths; his lamp lit countless midnights; his discipline carved a narrative of justice that no empire could silence. His classmate’s work, though loud, would be lost in the dust—its pages brittle, its voice forgotten.

A Lesson for the Ages

In the art of contingency planning, as in the crafting of immortal books, the lesson is simple yet profound:
Data is the lifeblood of truth.
Without it, plans are hollow decrees; with it, they are shields strong enough to withstand calamity.

When storms descend, when revolutions brew, when businesses falter and empires quake, only one manuscript will guide you:
The one written by steady hands under flickering lamplight.
The one steeped in sweat, ink, and sleepless nights.
The one whose author, like Rizal, carried the humility to listen to every whisper of history before daring to write a single word.

For destiny, as the old libraries remind us, does not bow to arrogance.
It kneels only to truth—
and to those patient enough to gather it.

What makes a good Cybersecurity metrics?

The Challenge of Cybersecurity Metrics lies in the difficulty of accurately measuring and interpreting security effectiveness in a constantly evolving threat landscape. Unlike financial or operational metrics, cybersecurity often deals with abstract concepts such as risk, resilience, and potential vulnerabilities, which are not always easy to quantify. Organizations may struggle to identify which metrics truly reflect security performance versus those that create a false sense of protection. Additionally, aligning these metrics with business goals and ensuring they remain relevant as threats change makes the process even more complex.

Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) are measurable values that reflect how effectively an organization is achieving its strategic and operational goals. In cybersecurity, KPIs help track progress and performance by focusing on specific objectives such as reducing incident response time, lowering the number of successful attacks, or increasing employee compliance with security training. By monitoring KPIs, organizations can identify strengths, address weaknesses, and ensure their security efforts align with overall business objectives.

Cybersecurity Security Metrics are measurable indicators used to evaluate the effectiveness of an organization’s security strategies, tools, and policies. They provide insights into how well systems are protected against threats, how quickly incidents are detected and resolved, and whether compliance requirements are being met. By tracking metrics such as the number of detected vulnerabilities, incident response time, or percentage of patched systems, organizations can make data-driven decisions, improve defenses, and demonstrate accountability in safeguarding information assets.